Skip to main content

LAHORE HIGH COURT DECISION REGARDING APPOINTMENT UNDER 17-A RULE ON REGULAR BASIS

Lahore High Court, Lahore issued decision regarding granting the benefit of 17-A Rule of the Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1974 that appointments under Rule 17-A shall be made on regular basis.
  • Government has changed its policy qua mode of recruitment from contract to regular. Besides, this Court in the above-noted judgments has already declared the contract employment under Rule 17-A of the Rules, 1974, without lawful authority.
  • More so, the Government has introduced an Ordinance, 2019 whereby all the contract employees completing their three years' service, have been allowed to be regularized. Therefore, I feel no hesitation in declaring this letter redundant as it lost its wisdom after 14.10.2009 when services of contract employees were directed to be regularized, and new appointments were also allowed to be made on regular basis subject to fulfillment of prerequisites.
  • Given weight to the above, this petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to regularize the services of all the employees who were appointed granting the benefit of Rule 17-A of the Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1974, forthwith irrespective, whether they have completed three/four years' service or not as their contract employment after 2009 was unlawful obviously, they had to be appointed on regular basis. It is also directed that in future, all the appointments under Rule 17-A ibid shall be made on regular basis.
  • The Registrar of this Court shall circulate copy of this order to all the District & Sessions Judges in the Province and also send copy to the Chief Secretary, Government of the Punjab, for its compliance/implementation.




Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR WORK CHARGED EMPLOYEES, DAILY WAGERS AND CONTINGENT PAID STAFF

 Pursuant to the approval of Provincial Cabinet through circulation among the Provincial Ministers under Rule 25(1)(b) of the Punjab Government Rules of Business 2011 and in terms of Rule 27 and Rule 28(15) of the Punjab Government Rules of Business 2011,  the Policy for workcharged / contingent paid and daily wage employees is hereby notified as under:- POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR WORK CHARGED EMPLOYEES,  DAILY WAGERS AND CONTINGENT PAID STAFF   LEGAL POSITION   The Chapter titled "Fundamental Rights of the Constitution of Pakistan guarantees equality of citizens and safeguard against discrimination in services. Article 25 of the Constitution treats all citizens as equal before law and entitles them to equal protection of law while Article 27 provides that no citizen otherwise qualified for appointment in the service of Pakistan shall be discriminated against. The Supreme Court of Pakistan in its judgment dated 19.01.993 in Human Rights Case No.104 of 1992 stated tha...
Read more

TIME SCALE UP-GRADATION TO NEXT HIGHER SCALE OF OFFICERS OF PITC

  Managing Director, Pakistan Electric Power Company (PVT.) Limited (PEPCO) issued an office order regarding time scale upgradation of officers of PITC from BPS-19 to BPS-20. In pursuance of PEPCO's Office Memorandum No.GM(HR)/HRD/A-693/17384-421 dated: 27.05.2010, No.GM(HR)/HRD/A-693/1250-81 dated 17.08.2010, NO.GM(HR)/HRD/A-693(M)/ 2032-63 dated 29.09.2011, No. GM(HR)/HRD/3695-3720 dated 21.12.2011 and the Meeting of Time Scale Up-gradation(TSU) board held on 31.10.2020, the following officers of PITC, are hereby allowed up-gradation from BPS-19 to BPS-20 with effect from the dates mentioned against each:  Muhammad Fiaz Awan Director (IT) w.e.f 27.08.2019 Attique Ahmad Director (IT) w.e.f 27.08.2019  The above officers will hold the same posts but with a changed designation of next higher post in line by prefixing the word "Additional".  The officers so upgraded, if already exercising financial powers, shall exercise enhanced financial powers i.e. enhanced by 50% o...
Read more

GRANT OF ADDITIONAL CHARGE ALLOWANCE

Government of the Punjab, Finance Department issued clarification regarding grant of additional charge allowance. I am directed to refer to this Department's circular letter No.FD.SRII.2-38/70, dated 17.03.1988, on the subject cited above and state that following questions have arisen about the subject matter: Whether additional charge allowance for more than one posts can be granted to the same officer? Whether additional charge allowance against a post lower in status than the incumbent post-of the officer, holding the charge, can be allowed?  The case has been examined in the Finance Department. It is clarified that where the Administrative Departments/organizations grant additional charge of more than one posts to its officers due to service exigencies, the additional charge allowance in this behalf shall be allowed against all such additional charges by the concerned authority, for a period not exceeding 3 months, against each post. However, if the need persists, the addi...
Read more